Skip to main content
· 10/11/1984

Evans v. Firestone

Citations

  • 457 So. 2d 1351

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The proposed amendment now before us affects the function of the legislative and the judicial branches of government.\
  • \[T]he voter must be told clearly and unambiguously ... what the amendment does... . The ballot summary should tell the voter the legal effect of the amendment... .\
  • the summary “should tell the voter the legal effect of the amendment, and no more”
  • statute of frauds facts not in dispute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.