Evans v. Evans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding prospective social security benefits are not marital property as they constitute unascertainable contingent future interest
• construing the act as benefiting both employees and their dependents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cunningham v. Cunningham
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2010-07-13· cited 127×
• Queen v. Queen
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-03-02· cited 56×
• Ripley v. Ripley
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-01-06· cited 15×
• Smith v. Smith
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-02-03· cited 13×
• Bolt v. Bolt
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-02-17· cited 11×
• Diephouse v. Diephouse
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1983-07-20· cited 7×
• Allen v. Allen
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1985-02-10· cited 2×
• Crombez v. Crombez
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-04-06· cited 2×
• Holland v. Holland
  Fairfax County Circuit Court· 1999-03-03· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hisquierdo v. Hisquierdo
  Supreme Court· 1979-01-22· cited 837×
• Johnson v. Johnson
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1956-09-04· cited 86×
• George F. Delno v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
  Ninth Circuit· 1965-06-07· cited 55×
• Miller v. Miller
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1978-06-05· cited 35×
• Umber v. Umber
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1979-02-20· cited 33×
• Feldman v. Feldman
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1974-02-11· cited 31×
• Chisnell v. Chisnell
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1978-04-18· cited 29×
• Hutchins v. Hutchins
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1976-09-27· cited 27×
• Guerrero v. Guerrero
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-11-16· cited 17×
• Harmon v. Harmon
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1978-07-28· cited 16×
• Petrie v. Petrie
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1972-05-26· cited 10×