Evans v. Barbourville Brick Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the VHDPA applies only “in the context of maritime designs” and rejecting the argument that the Act should be expanded to cover condominium designs
• “The Court has discretion to decide whether to impose sanctions under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and its inherent authority . . . .”
• “Rule 54(d)(2)(B) provides the procedure to file a claim for attorneys’ fees where they are authorized under another statute . . . .”
• “Cases decided after the 2009 amendments have continued to interpret Weyant [v. Okst, 198 F.3d 311 (2nd Cir. 1999)] as establishing that a ‘motion for attorney's fees is timely under FRCP 54(d)(2)(B

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).