Evans Indus. Coatings, Inc. v. CHANCERY COURT OF UNION CTY.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that simply being a part of a contract does not create “a particular relationship of trust or confidence”
• complaint “simply alleged that [contractor and consultant] were parties to an agreement who had promised to perform certain acts,” and “[n]o particular relationship of trust or confidence developed because of the agreement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).