· 9/18/2001
Evan v. Estell
Citations
- 203 F.R.D. 172
- 51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 107
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14949
- 2001 WL 1112758
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The plain language of Rule 53 shows that the review of a Special Master's decision requires the court to make a de novo determination, not conduct a de novo hearing.”
- “The plain language of Rule 53 shows that the review of a Special Master's decision requires the court to make a de novo determination, not conduct a de novo hearing.”
- “The plain language of Rule 53 shows that the review of a Special Master's decision requires the court to make a de novo determination, not conduct a de novo hearing.”
- “The plain language of Rule 53 shows that the review of a Special Master's decision requires the court to make a de novo determination, not conduct a de novo hearing.”
- “The plain language of Rule 53 shows that the review of a Special Master’s decision requires the court to make a de novo determination, not conduct a de novo hearing.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mannion
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.