Eva v. Midwest National Mortgage Banc, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that both federal and Ohio fair housing claims may be analyzed using federal case law
• concluding that § 3604 covers transactions related to acquiring a home, as opposed to § 3605, which covers “the making or purchasing of loans or providing other financial assistance for maintaining a dwelling previously acquired”
• declaring that a literal sale or rental is not required for § 3604 to apply
• noting that although unconscionability is typically an affirmative defense it can also support a claim for declaratory relief
• finding that the plaintiffs alleged that the defendants committed corrupt activity under the PCA when they alleged that the defendants committed multiple acts of conversion, mail fraud, and wire fraud
• stating under Ohio law, with respect to conversion of money, a claim is proper where the funds in question were specific or sequestered, identifiable monies or funds were entrusted to the defendant's care

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).