Eutzy v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \there is nothing in Booth which suggests that that decision should be retroactively applied to cases in which the claim was not preserved by a timely objection\
• “[T]here is nothing in Booth [v. Maryland, 482 U.S. 496 (1987)] which suggests that that decision should be retroactively applied to cases in which the claim was not preserved by a timely objection”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).