· 3/11/1966
Eutaw Enterprises, Inc. v. Mayor of Baltimore
Citations
- 217 A.2d 348
- 241 Md. 686
- 1966 Md. LEXIS 754
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding ordinances that the City Council knew would only affect one commercial check casher because the ordinances were general in application and applied equally to similarly situated properties
- upholding ordinances that the City Council knew would only affect one commercial check casher because the ordinances were general in application and applied equally to similarly situated properties
- upholding ordinances that the City Council knew would only affect one commercial check casher because the ordinances were general in application and applied equally to similarly situated properties
- upholding ordinances that the City Council knew would only affect one commercial check casher because the ordinances were general in application and applied equally to similarly situated properties
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hammond
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.