Eurpac Service Inc. v. Republic Acceptance Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a creditor who has actual knowledge of a debtor selling goods belonging to others satisfies the \generally known\ and \substantial engagement\ exception in UCC § 9-102(a)(20)
• finding that a creditor with actual knowledge of a consignment arrangement cannot ben efit from section 9-319 of the UCC
• affirming decision that a creditor who has actual knowledge of consigned goods does not have priority in those goods over the consignor
• \It would be absurd to hold a creditor responsible for imputed knowledge but not hold the same creditor responsible for actual knowledge.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).