European American Bank v. Launzel-Pennes (In Re Launzel-Pennes)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[E]ven partial reliance by a creditor on a false financial statement may be sufficient for a section 523(a)(2)(B) violation.”
• “even partial reliance by a creditor on a false financial statement may be sufficient for a section 523(a)(2)(B) violation”
• BPP’s use of the word “paralegal” 12 in her Pennysaver ads violated § 110(f) because paralegal is a 13 “similar term” that falls within the statute
• “The law is clear that writings containing pertinent omissions may qualify as 33 Those are loans from Frears, Frears & Yellin, Gersten, Orans and Lilling. The schedule of debt also includes debts to Amex ($203,576) and Argus Capital Funding ($16,125

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).