· 2/6/1989
Eurid MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK of CHICAGO, Defendant-Appellee
Citations
- 867 F.2d 1023
- 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 156
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 1505
- 49 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 57
- 49 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,680
- 1989 WL 9248
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[s'jummary judgment will not be defeated simply because issues of motive or intent are involved”
- “When a rational trier of fact could not find for the nonmoving party based on the record as a whole, there is no trial issue.”
- “Where the sample size or alleged effect is so statistically insignificant that no inference of discriminatory impact is proper, plaintiff fails to present a prima facie case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cudahy, Flaum, Kanne, Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.