Skip to main content
· 2/6/1989

Eurid MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK of CHICAGO, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 867 F.2d 1023
  • 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 156
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 1505
  • 49 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 57
  • 49 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,680
  • 1989 WL 9248

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[s'jummary judgment will not be defeated simply because issues of motive or intent are involved”
  • “When a rational trier of fact could not find for the nonmoving party based on the record as a whole, there is no trial issue.”
  • “Where the sample size or alleged effect is so statistically insignificant that no inference of discriminatory impact is proper, plaintiff fails to present a prima facie case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Flaum, Kanne, Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.