Skip to main content
· 6/6/2006

Eureka VIII LLC v. Niagara Falls Holdings LLC

Citations

  • 899 A.2d 95
  • 2006 Del. Ch. LEXIS 98
  • 2006 WL 1579712

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Holdings was in no equitable position to invoke the [Buy/Sell Provision], having committed a prior material breach.”
  • considering and applying the equitable defense of laches under an LLC agreement
  • “To deal with the cognitive dissonance such claims create and the intrusion they make on the reliability of written contracts, our law has embraced a handy tool of the common law jurist: the ability to increase the level of proof the plaintiff must submit in order to prevail.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Strine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.