Eureka Mfg. Co. v. Wimberly
Citations
- 113 Miss. 90
- 73 So. 871
Syllabus
<p>Work and Labor. Recovery on quantum, meruit.</p> <p>Where defendant offered plaintiff five hundred dollars to' tear down and rebuild a house and plaintiff, without formally accepting the offer, proceeded to do the work pursuant thereto, this amounted to an acceptance of the offer, and he was not permitted to recover on the theory that he did the work under an implied promise on the part of defendant to pay him therefor so much as it might he reasonably worth.</p>
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.