Skip to main content
· 1/18/1886

Eureka Lake & Yuba Canal Co. v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 116 U.S. 410
  • 6 S. Ct. 429
  • 29 L. Ed. 671
  • 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1779

Syllabus

<p>When the court may reasonably infer from the record in a case brought here by writ of error from a State court that the Federal question raised here was necessarily involved in the decision there, the court will not dismiss the writ on motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, although it may not appear affirmatively on the record that the question was raised there.</p> <p>When a court, haying acquired jurisdiction of a cause and the parties to it, issues an order upon one of the parties to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt in disobeying a temporary restraining order of injunction made in the cause, and he conceals himself to evade service of the process, the court may, on proper return of the facts, direct service of the order to show cause to be made oh his attorney of record, and after due service thereof, may proceed to hear the order to show cause, and to adjudge the same.</p>

Judges: Waite

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.