· 6/3/1987
Eureka Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Kidwell
Citations
- 672 F. Supp. 436
- 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10136
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- both refusing to find an implied cause of action under HOLA in light of Cort and its progeny
- Congressional choice not to signal implied remedy when it amended HOLA in 1966 and 1982 weighed heavily against implication
- both refusing to find an implied cause of action under HOLA in light of Cort and its progeny
- no unique federal interest under HOLA in areas traditionally left to state law
- no unique federal interest under HOLA in areas traditionally left to state law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orrick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.