Skip to main content
· 6/3/1987

Eureka Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Kidwell

Citations

  • 672 F. Supp. 436
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • both refusing to find an implied cause of action under HOLA in light of Cort and its progeny
  • Congressional choice not to signal implied remedy when it amended HOLA in 1966 and 1982 weighed heavily against implication
  • both refusing to find an implied cause of action under HOLA in light of Cort and its progeny
  • no unique federal interest under HOLA in areas traditionally left to state law
  • no unique federal interest under HOLA in areas traditionally left to state law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orrick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.