Eureka Elkhorn Coal Co. v. Lawson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing 5 declaratory relief claim where it was “nothing more than a duplication of [plaintiffs’] 6 breach of contract claim”
• “Discovery 10 items . . . are not proper subjects for judicial notice 11 because they are not ‘self-authenticating’ and thus 12 cannot be verified.”
• “Discovery items . . . are not proper 9 {| subjects for judicial notice because they are not ‘self- 10 | authenticating’ and thus cannot be verified.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).