Skip to main content
· 5/22/2020

Eugenia Schell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the right to a jury trial is of constitutional magnitude, while the manner waiving the right is a procedural evidentiary issue
  • rejecting State’s argument that Hos ratified her attorney’s oral waiver of her jury trial right by failing to object during two discussions on the record relating to having a bench trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.