Eugene P. Van Arsdel v. Texas A&m University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that university employee could not recover his position on grounds of duress after resigning due to university’s threat to bring dismissal proceedings against him based on accusations of sexual harassment
• holding that university employee could not recover his position on grounds of duress after resigning due to university’s threat to bring dismissal proceedings against him based on accusations of sexual harassment
• reversing an order granting a preliminary injunction and holding that reinstatement after trial, coupled with an award of backpay, should suffice to redress the alleged wrong
• “Since reinstatement after trial, coupled with back pay, would suffice to redress appellee’s alleged wrong, we find that the preliminary injunction must be vacated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).