Skip to main content
· 9/24/1987

Eugene Lemos v. Roy Fencl, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Richard J. Kilmartin

Citations

  • 828 F.2d 616
  • 9 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 197
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 12633

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • complaint “warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification or reversal of existing law cannot violate Rule 11 even if it is filed for an improper purpose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Choy, Goodwin, Tang

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.