Eugene Devbrow v. Steven Gallegos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a motive” for destroying his legal documents could not survive summary judgment on a First Amendment retaliation claim.
• concluding that a prisoner's verified complaint that provided only \speculation regarding the officers' motive\ for destroying his documents was insufficient to survive summary judgment on a First Amendment retaliation claim
• concluding that a prisoner’s verified complaint that provided only “speculation regarding the officers’ motive” for destroying his legal documents could not survive summary judgment on a First Amendment retaliation claim
• affirming a district court’s grant of summary judgment based on its decision to strike a document the plaintiff “failed to authenticate” under Rule 901
• affirming summary judgment where plaintiff only submitted conclusional verified complaint allegations that his legal materials had been destroyed and thus failed to “come forward with evidence” supporting his access-to-courts claim
• finding conclusory allegations in verified complaint insufficient to survive motion for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).