Eugene Devbrow v. Eke Kalu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court “use[s] the [accrual] rule that applies to the common-law cause of action most similar to the kind of claim the plaintiff asserts”
• holding that a court “use[s] the [accrual] rule that applies to the common-law cause of action most similar to the kind of claim the plaintiff asserts”
• holding that plaintiff’s deliberate indifference 14 claim did not accrue until he learned he had late-stage cancer
• holding that, as long as jail officials are aware of the inmate’s need for treatment and refuse to act, the refusal continues as long as the officials had the power to act
• holding that, as long as jail officials are aware of the inmate’s need for treatment and refuse to act, the refusal continues as long as the officials had the power to act
• holding that, as long as jail officials are aware of the inmate’s need for treatment and refuse to act, the refusal continues as long as the officials had the power to act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).