Skip to main content
· 12/17/2003

Eugene C. Anderson v. Smithfield Foods

Citations

  • 353 F.3d 912

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating sanctions where there was “scant on-point authority to guide the reasonable lawyer” to conclude that existing law did not warrant the RICO claims
  • reversing an imposition of Rule 11 sanctions because even though the court agreed that the underlying claims should be dismissed, the court was “unable to conclude that only an unreasonable lawyer would have made these claims”
  • “The standard for testing conduct under amended Rule 11 is reasonableness under the circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hull, Cox, Paul

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.