Eugene Anthony Nolan v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• telephone company’s monitoring o f calls does not violate 47 U.S.C. §605 because illegal user has impliedly consented to company's attempts to properly bill user
• “It is settled beyond doubt that the constitutional fair- and impartial-jury guaranty does not require that every economic, racial, or ethnic class shall be represented on every jury venire or panel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).