Skip to main content
· 3/10/1995

Eudaley v. State

Citations

  • 47 Ill. Ct. Cl. 86
  • 1995 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 7

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “For all the Court can tell, an additional requirement of pomposity, vehemence, or bombast was meant to differentiate ‘harangue’ from its clausal neighbor, ‘oration.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mitchell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.