Euclid v. Amiott
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1583
Syllabus
Right to speedy trial R.C. 2945.71 extension of time tolling R.C. 2945.72 reasonable continuance motion to dismiss expiration prima facie case for dismissal state's burden of production statutory time limit first-degree misdemeanor 90 days after arrest or service of summons recusal of trial judge visiting judge assigned no time waiver executed sua sponte continuance journal entry containing reasons for continuance. The trial court erred in proceeding to trial after the speedy-trial time had elapsed where appellant had not waived his right to a speedy trial.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]e believe that the Court will decide the [alien’s immigration case] in a reasonable time and that it would be wrong to conclude that there is no significant likelihood that the government will prevail.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.