Eubanks v. Hobbs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the portion of an applicant’s property that is occupied by a town roadway may not be regarded as the “lot” to be developed, since “land under a road is already developed and for a use incompatible with other uses by the owner”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).