Eubanks v. Ferrier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs knowledge of information from a peer review committee member did not alter the prohibition
• construing the Georgia statute making medical peer review materials privileged and citing cases from other states
• construing the Georgia statute making medical peer review materials privileged and citing cases from other states
• identifying purpose of peer review statutes and accepting the opinions of other courts that the statute represents a “proper legislative choice” between concerns for candor and access to evidence
• construing similar language in OCGA § 31-7-143 as to medical review committees
• construing similar language in OCGA § 31-7-143 as to medical review committees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).