Eubank v. City of Edina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the common law offense of indecent exposure sought to punish “intentional” and “knowing” exposures, not “merely accidental or inadvertent exposure”
• holding that the common law offense of indecent exposure sought to punish \intentional\ and \knowing\ exposures, not \merely accidental or inadvertent exposure\
• stating that common law concept of general intent corresponds loosely with the Criminal Code’s mental state of “knowingly”
• State must prove material elements of offense beyond a reasonable doubt
• determining requisite mental state for indecent exposure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).