Euart v. Yoakley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the settlor’s intention is the polestar by which courts must be guided in determining whether a revocation of an inter vivos trust, has occurred”
• reasoning that the devise of trust property in a will which neither expressly or inferentially referred to the trust at issue did not constitute a revocation of the trust because it did not overcome the normal testamentary character of a will provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).