Skip to main content
· 12/20/2000

Eua Cogenex Corp. v. North Rockland Central School District

Citations

  • 124 F. Supp. 2d 861
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18978
  • 2000 WL 1909604

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Section 50-e applies only to tort claims, and that Section 3813 applies to all state claims asserted against a school district
  • finding a genuine issue of fact where the “[p]laintiff disputes that [purported agent] stated at any point that he knew that the contract would not be valid and binding absent board approval”
  • “Although business-to-business transactions could in some rare cases have a wide enough impact on consumers to justify a § 349 claim, it is well established that private contract disputes, unique to the parties . . . would not fall within the ambit of the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMAHON

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.