Skip to main content
· 7/2/1951

Etz v. Mamerow

Citations

  • 233 P.2d 442
  • 72 Ariz. 228
  • 1951 Ariz. LEXIS 219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The right to possess, to use and to enjoy land upon which an easement is claimed remains in the owner of the fee except in so far as the exercise of such right is inconsistent with the purpose and character of the easement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phelps, Udall, Stanford, De Concini Prade

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.