Ettinger v. Oyster Bay II Cmty. Prop. Owners' Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that California Labor Code § 226(a) applied to workers who do not perform the majority 4 BERNSTEIN V. VIRGIN AMERICA of their work in any one state, but who are based for work purposes in California
• noting that California Labor Code § 1199(c) “mak[es] violation of an IWC wage order a misdemeanor”
• explaining that it has not held “that 10 California’s employment laws always apply to every minute or hour of work performed in this 11 state”
• “[B]eing a 3 nonresident does not exclude an employee from the state’s labor protections.”
• “[I]f a pilot or flight attendant has a designated home-base airport, section 226 would apply if that airport is in California, and not if it is elsewhere.”
• “The core purpose of section 226 is to ensure an employer document[s] the basis of the employee compensation payments to assist the employee in determining whether he or she has been compensated properly.” (quotations omitted) (alteration in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).