Etter v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• risk of harm to outdoor public telephone patron injured by out-of-control car was not foreseeable, as a matter of law
• risk of harm to outdoor public telephone patron injured by out-of-control car was not foreseeable, as a matter of law
• Michigan Bell had no duty, as a matter of law, to outdoor public telephone patron injured by out-of-control car
• Michigan Bell had no duty, as a matter of law, to outdoor public telephone patron injured by out-of-control car

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).