Skip to main content
· 4/4/2014

Etta Bracewell v. U.S. Bank National Association

Citations

  • 748 F.3d 793
  • 2014 WL 1356850
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 6228

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that Credit Agreement Statute barred debtor’s negligent-misrepresentation claim based on creditor’s oral representation that it would postpone foreclosure sale
  • “looking beyond the label” of equitable estoppel and analyzing promissory estoppel because the complaint alleged that theory “in substance”
  • affirming the dismissal of a complaint alleging promissory estoppel because the claim of an oral agreement was barred by the Minnesota Credit Agreement Statute
  • distinguishing between an equitable-estoppel claim and a promissory-estoppel claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Murphy, Colloton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.