Skip to main content
· 9/20/2007

Etsitty v. Utah Transit Authority

Citations

  • 502 F.3d 1215
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22989
  • 90 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,994
  • 101 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1357
  • 2007 WL 2774160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Use of a restroom designated for the opposite sex does not constitute a mere failure to conform to sex stereotypes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henry and Murphy, Circuit Judges, and Figa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.