Skip to main content
· 3/12/1993

Etheridge Oil Co. v. Panciera

Citations

  • 818 F. Supp. 480
  • 22 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 82
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5267
  • 1993 WL 127204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that under North Carolina's version of the U.C.C. — adopted in essentially the same form as Rhode Island's — a contract to supply fuel constitutes a contract for the sale of goods
  • \North Carolina courts have recognized that the intent of [UCC § 2-209(4)] is to give legal effect to the parties' actual later conduct.\ (citation omitted)
  • \North Carolina courts have recognized that the intent of [UCC § 2-209(4)] is to give legal effect to the parties' actual later conduct.\ (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Francis J. Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.