Etheredge v. Monsanto Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing adequate notice supplies “facts connecting the injury or illness with the employment, and indicating to a reasonably conscientious manager that the case might involve a potential compensation claim” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
• applying substantial evidence standard of review to Commission’s finding of timely notice within ninety days as required by statute
• holding the commission's findings regarding notice were supported by substantial evidence
• stating the Appellate Panel is the ultimate fact finder in workers' compensation cases and is not bound by the Single Commissioner's findings of facts and conclusions of law
• reiterating \the liberal construction our Supreme Court requires of workers' compensation provisions for notice.\
• stating the Appellate Panel is the ultimate fact finder in workers' compensation cases, is not bound by the single commissioner's findings of fact, and makes the final determination of witness credibility and the weight to be accorded evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).