Etheredge v. Genie Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court's order entered while appeal was pending \was a nullity and would not support a notice of appeal\
• holding that trial court's order entered while appeal was pending \was a nullity and would not support a notice of appeal\
• concluding that North Carolina’s statute of repose is a procedural statute of limitation because it is not so “inextricably bound up in [a] statute creating the right that it is deemed a portion of the substantive right itself.”
• finding that a North Carolina statute imposing a limitations period was a statute of limitations, not a statute of creation, because “it is not inextricably bound up in a statute creating the right or cause of action”
• “it is up to this Court to determine, for the purpose of this action, whether §1-50(6) is a substantive part or procedural part of North Carolina law”
• North Carolina's six year statute of limitations which was located in a separate part of North Carolina's civil code was procedural, not substantive, and therefore Alabama's two year statute of limitations applied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).