Ethel D. Parrish v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• abandons distinction between substantial and insubstantial physical injury, but distinguishes “a case where no physical injuries of any kind were sustained”
• “[T]he tort-feasor takes the victim as he finds him.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Waldon v. Covington
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-05-27· cited 166×
• Williams v. Baker
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-04-09· cited 149×
• Asuncion v. Columbia Hospital for Women
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-09-17· cited 44×
• William J. Garber and John J. Hurley v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1978-05-04· cited 27×
• Robert Kropinski v. World Plan Executive Council--Us
  D.C. Circuit· 1988-08-05· cited 27×
• Morgan v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-08-31· cited 27×
• Saunders v. Air Florida, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 1983-03-10· cited 17×
• Williams v. Baker
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-06-21· cited 13×
• Ruby C. Bourne v. Fawan Washburn
  D.C. Circuit· 1971-01-04· cited 6×
• Garber v. United States
  District of Columbia· 1976-11-12· cited 4×
• Ethel D. Parrish v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1967-04-05· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Perry v. Capital Traction Co.
  D.C. Circuit· 1929-05-06· cited 26×
• Hamilan Corporation, T/a Manger-Hamilton Hotel v. Jeanni M. O'Neill
  D.C. Circuit· 1959-12-03· cited 8×

Other cases named Ethel D. Parrish v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Ethel D. Parrish v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1967-04-05· cited 1×