E.T. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that committee failed to carry its ultimate burden
• holding that committee failed to carry its ultimate burden
• concluding that duty of fairness to opposing party and counsel applies even when attorney appears pro se, for \an attorney who acts in contravention of the rule cannot justify that conduct on the basis that it was intended to benefit himself or herself rather than a client\
• burden higher than preponderance of evidence, lower than beyond reasonable doubt
• burden higher than preponderance of evidence, lower than beyond reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).