Estle Smith v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because \[i]t has been suggested\ that Rule 60(b)(6) only applies when (l)-(5) do not, the court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief
• “Since we interpret the request for relief as coming under clause (b)(1), clause (b)(6) would not apply.”
• “[I]t is settled that an appellant cannot circumvent the one year limitation [applicable to Rule 60(b)(1)] by involving the residual clause (6) of Rule 60(b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).