Skip to main content
· 11/19/1888

Estis v. Trabue

Citations

  • 128 U.S. 225
  • 9 S. Ct. 58
  • 32 L. Ed. 437
  • 1888 U.S. LEXIS 2213

Syllabus

<p>A writ of error, in which both the plaintiff’s in error and the defendants in error are designated merely by the name of a firm, containing the expression “& Co.” is not sufficient to give this court jurisdiction, but, as the record discloses the names of the persons composing the firms, the writ is, under § 1005 of the Revised Statutes, amendable by this court, and-will not be dismissed.</p> <p>Where the judgment below is a money judgment against “ the claimants ” ■ and their two sureties in a bond, naming them, jointly, and the sureties do not join in the writ of error, and there is no proper summons and severance, the defect is a substantial one, which this court cannot amend, and by reason of which it has no jurisdiction to try the case, and it will, of its own motion, dismiss the case, without awaiting the action ■ of a party.</p>

Judges: Blatchford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.