Esteves-Jimenez v. Sosa Llorens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding there was “no dispute regarding the second factor because AV already 17 ||makes the products that are being accused of infringing”
• noting factors that have been considered by courts, including “the strength 15 of any threatening language in communications between the parties” and “the depth and extent of 16 infringement analysis conducted by the patent holder”
• patentee sent a cease-and-desist letter, litigated 3 six cases regarding the asserted patents, and entered into licensing agreements, all in the district
• Defendant “has engaged in judicial patent enforcement with respect to the 16 patents at issue or a related patent in this District multiple times…it has initiated six patent 17 infringement lawsuits in the District”
• “So long as there is an actual charge of infringement, . . . that is enough to give rise to a case or controversy, particularly where a specific infringing product is identified by the patentee.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).