Skip to main content
· 7/1/1873

Estes v. White

Citations

  • 61 Me. 22

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “a general jury verdict based on an instruction including two or more separate instances of a criminal offense, whether explicitly stated in the instruction or based on the proof—violates the requirement of a unanimous verdict.”
  • finding palpable error where the jury instruction \did not require the jury to differentiate which of the two instances was the basis of the conviction.\
  • Unanimous verdict means that to convict a defendant of a specific criminal act, all twelve jurors must agree on the specific criminal act committed by defendant
  • examining federal law to assist in defining the unanimity concept
  • examining federal law to assist in defining the unanimity concept
  • examining federal law to assist in defining the unanimity concept

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Apfleton, Barrows, Danforth, Virgin, Walton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.