Skip to main content

Estes v. State

Citations

  • 146 P.3d 1114
  • 122 Nev. 1123
  • 122 Nev. Adv. Rep. 96
  • 2006 Nev. LEXIS 127

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the tension between Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) (1984) and NRS 50.295
  • \We discern no error in maintaining the separate charges of sexual assault and battery with intent to commit a crime.\
  • it is within the province of the jury to weigh the evidence and make credibility determinations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maupin, Rose, Becker, Gibbons, Douglas, Hardesty, Parraguirre

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.