Skip to main content
· 8/27/1998

Estes v. Scotsman Group, Inc.

Citations

  • 16 F. Supp. 2d 983
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14566
  • 1998 WL 614407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Cases allowing public agency involvement to be substituted for public comment have only allowed such a substitution if the public is provided an ample opportunity for comment and there is substantial involvement throughout the cleanup by a state agency”
  • finding a “civil action” requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mihm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.