Skip to main content
· 10/10/1910

Estes v. Kauffman

Citations

  • 44 Pa. Super. 114
  • 1910 Pa. Super. LEXIS 138

Syllabus

<p>Contract — Sale—Rescission—Return of goods — Condition—Sale by auction.</p> <p>Where a purchaser of goods finds after their delivery to him that they are not of the quality for which he contracted, he may rescind the contract and return the goods, but he cannot impose as a condition for the return of the goods by him, that the seller shall reimburse him for freight charges and cartage which he had expended for their transportation; nor can the purchaser in such a case, after the seller has declined to pay the charges, sell the goods at auction for the freight, cartage and storage charges.</p>

Judges: Beaver, Head, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.