Estes v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding an unappealed ruling becomes the law of the case and precludes further consideration of the issue on appeal
• holding this Court will reverse the trial court's ruling on a directed verdict motion only where there is no evidence to support the ruling or where the ruling is controlled by error of law (citing Hinkle v. National Cas. Ins. Co., 354 S.C. 92, 96, 579 S.E.2d 616, 618 (2003))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).