Skip to main content
· 10/26/1998

Estes v. Barry

Citations

  • 967 P.2d 284
  • 132 Idaho 82
  • 1998 Ida. LEXIS 128

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Rule 15(b) is not implicated by factual issues raised in a motion for summary judgment
  • holding that Rule 15(b) is not implicated by factual issues raised in a motion for summary judgment
  • declining to discuss issue of attorney fees because the brief contained neither argument nor authority on the issue.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Trout, Johnson, Silak, Walters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.