Esterly Harvesting Machine Co. v. Criswell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding an IRA account that passively increased in value should be valued at the date of the final hearing rather than the divorce filing date
• finding no error when the family court valued IRA and its passive increase at date of final hearing rather than divorce filing date
• finding no error when the family court valued IRA with passive increase at date of final hearing rather than divorce filing date
• finding no error when the family court valued IRA with passive increase at date of final hearing rather than divorce filing date
• finding a party's interest in a company was not a gift because he did not offer any evidence \by way of check or testimony\
• finding no error when the family court valued IRA and its passive increase at date of final hearing rather than divorce filing date

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).